Last data update: Apr 22, 2024. (Total: 46599 publications since 2009)
Records 1-30 (of 200 Records) |
Query Trace: Chung J[original query] |
---|
Audiologist Perception on Reporting Hearing Assessment Results to State Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs
Chung W , Sanchez-Gomez MC . J Early Hear Detect Interv 12/28/2021 6 (2) 79-86 PURPOSE: To describe an evaluation conducted by 39 state Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs on the reporting process and system usability for audiologists when reporting the hearing test results to the EHDI program and the barriers encountered during reporting. METHOD: Each author independently extracted numbers, percentages, and texts from the evaluation reports into an Excel spreadsheet, which then became the dataset. Authors then compared and cross-checked the datasets before coding. Texts conveying similar concepts were coded with the same name and organized into categories. Finally, thematic identification and analysis were performed when a theme(s) or concept(s) that pertained to similar challenges encountered by audiologists was identified and organized under a higher-order domain. RESULTS: Some audiologists reported no barriers when reporting hearing test results to the state EHDI programs. Among those audiologists who reported barriers, the most recurrent barrier was a non-user-friendly data system design. The second most recurrent barrier was not having adequate administrative time to report data as a busy clinician. The third most recurrent barrier was an incomplete understanding of the state EHDI reporting requirements. Finally, the method audiologists were required to use when reporting results also posed some challenges, such as no internet connection in rural areas when required to report via an internet portal. CONCLUSION: Because of the wide variety of barriers faced by audiologists, multiple strategies to improve the reporting process would likely be beneficial. |
Changes in self-measured blood pressure monitoring use in 14 states from 2019 to 2021 - Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic
Fang J , Zhou W , Hayes DK , Wall HK , Wozniak G , Chung A , Loustalot F . Am J Hypertens 2024 BACKGROUND: Self-measured blood pressure monitoring (SMBP) is an important out-of-office resource that is effective in improving hypertension control. Changes in SMBP use during the COVID-19 pandemic have not been described previously. METHODS: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data were used to quantify changes in SMBP use between 2019 (prior COVID-19 pandemic) and 2021 (during COVID-19 pandemic). Fourteen states administered the SMBP module in both years. All data were self-reported from adults who participated the BRFSS survey. We assessed receipt of SMBP recommendation from healthcare professional and actual use of SMBP among those with hypertension (n=68,820). Among those who used SMBP, we assessed SMBP use at home and sharing BP readings electronically with healthcare professional. RESULTS: Among adults with hypertension, there was no significant changes between 2019 and 2021 in those reporting SMBP use (57.0% vs. 55.7%) or receiving recommendation from healthcare professional to use SMBP (66.4% vs. 66.8%). However, among those who used SMBP, there were significant increases in use at home (87.7% vs 93.5%) and sharing BP readings electronically (8.6% vs 13.1%) from 2019 to 2021. Differences were noted by demographic characteristics and residence state. CONCLUSION: Receiving a recommendation from healthcare provider to use SMBP and actual use did not differ before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, among those who used SMBP, home use and sharing BP readings electronically with healthcare professional increased significantly, although overall sharing remained low (13.1%). Maximizing advances in virtual connections between clinical and community settings should be leveraged for improved hypertension management. |
Remote surveillance and detection of SARS-CoV-2 transmission among household members in King County, Washington
Emanuels A , Casto AM , Heimonen J , O'Hanlon J , Chow EJ , Ogokeh C , Rolfes MA , Han PD , Hughes JP , Uyeki TM , Frazar C , Chung E , Starita LM , Englund JA , Chu HY . BMC Infect Dis 2024 24 (1) 309 BACKGROUND: Early during the COVID-19 pandemic, it was important to better understand transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Household contacts of infected individuals are particularly at risk for infection, but delays in contact tracing, delays in testing contacts, and isolation and quarantine posed challenges to accurately capturing secondary household cases. METHODS: In this study, 346 households in the Seattle region were provided with respiratory specimen collection kits and remotely monitored using web-based surveys for respiratory illness symptoms weekly between October 1, 2020, and June 20, 2021. Symptomatic participants collected respiratory specimens at symptom onset and mailed specimens to the central laboratory in Seattle. Specimens were tested for SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR with whole genome sequencing attempted when positive. SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals were notified, and their household contacts submitted specimens every 2 days for 14 days. RESULTS: In total, 1371 participants collected 2029 specimens that were tested; 16 individuals (1.2%) within 6 households tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the study period. Full genome sequences were generated from 11 individuals within 4 households. Very little genetic variation was found among SARS-CoV-2 viruses sequenced from different individuals in the same household, supporting transmission within the household. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates web-based surveillance of respiratory symptoms, combined with rapid and longitudinal specimen collection and remote contact tracing, provides a viable strategy to monitor households and detect household transmission of SARS-CoV-2. TRIAL REGISTRATION IDENTIFIER: NCT04141930, Date of registration 28/10/2019. |
Post-recovery health domain scores among outpatients by SARS-CoV-2 testing status during the pre-Delta period
King JP , Chung JR , Donahue JG , Martin ET , Leis AM , Monto AS , Gaglani M , Dunnigan K , Raiyani C , Saydah S , Flannery B , Belongia EA . BMC Infect Dis 2024 24 (1) 300 BACKGROUND: Symptoms of COVID-19 including fatigue and dyspnea, may persist for weeks to months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study compared self-reported disability among SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative persons with mild to moderate COVID-19-like illness who presented for outpatient care before widespread COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS: Unvaccinated adults with COVID-19-like illness enrolled within 10 days of illness onset at three US Flu Vaccine Effectiveness Network sites were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by molecular assay. Enrollees completed an enrollment questionnaire and two follow-up surveys (7-24 days and 2-7 months after illness onset) online or by phone to assess illness characteristics and health status. The second follow-up survey included questions measuring global health, physical function, fatigue, and dyspnea. Scores in the four domains were compared by participants' SARS-CoV-2 test results in univariate analysis and multivariable Gamma regression. RESULTS: During September 22, 2020 - February 13, 2021, 2712 eligible adults were enrolled, 1541 completed the first follow-up survey, and 650 completed the second follow-up survey. SARS-CoV-2-positive participants were more likely to report fever at acute illness but were otherwise comparable to SARS-CoV-2-negative participants. At first follow-up, SARS-CoV-2-positive participants were less likely to have reported fully or mostly recovered from their illness compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative participants. At second follow-up, no differences by SARS-CoV-2 test results were detected in the four domains in the multivariable model. CONCLUSION: Self-reported disability was similar among outpatient SARS-CoV-2-positive and -negative adults 2-7 months after illness onset. |
Interim estimates of 2023-24 seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness - United States
Frutos AM , Price AM , Harker E , Reeves EL , Ahmad HM , Murugan V , Martin ET , House S , Saade EA , Zimmerman RK , Gaglani M , Wernli KJ , Walter EB , Michaels MG , Staat MA , Weinberg GA , Selvarangan R , Boom JA , Klein EJ , Halasa NB , Ginde AA , Gibbs KW , Zhu Y , Self WH , Tartof SY , Klein NP , Dascomb K , DeSilva MB , Weber ZA , Yang DH , Ball SW , Surie D , DeCuir J , Dawood FS , Moline HL , Toepfer AP , Clopper BR , Link-Gelles R , Payne AB , Chung JR , Flannery B , Lewis NM , Olson SM , Adams K , Tenforde MW , Garg S , Grohskopf LA , Reed C , Ellington S . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2024 73 (8) 168-174 In the United States, annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months. Using data from four vaccine effectiveness (VE) networks during the 2023-24 influenza season, interim influenza VE was estimated among patients aged ≥6 months with acute respiratory illness-associated medical encounters using a test-negative case-control study design. Among children and adolescents aged 6 months-17 years, VE against influenza-associated outpatient visits ranged from 59% to 67% and against influenza-associated hospitalization ranged from 52% to 61%. Among adults aged ≥18 years, VE against influenza-associated outpatient visits ranged from 33% to 49% and against hospitalization from 41% to 44%. VE against influenza A ranged from 46% to 59% for children and adolescents and from 27% to 46% for adults across settings. VE against influenza B ranged from 64% to 89% for pediatric patients in outpatient settings and from 60% to 78% for all adults across settings. These findings demonstrate that the 2023-24 seasonal influenza vaccine is effective at reducing the risk for medically attended influenza virus infection. CDC recommends that all persons aged ≥6 months who have not yet been vaccinated this season get vaccinated while influenza circulates locally. |
Work attendance with acute respiratory illness before and during COVID-19 pandemic, United States, 2018-2022
Ahmed F , Nowalk MP , Zimmerman RK , Bear T , Grijalva CG , Talbot HK , Florea A , Tartof SY , Gaglani M , Smith M , McLean HQ , King JP , Martin ET , Monto AS , Phillips CH , Wernli KJ , Flannery B , Chung JR , Uzicanin A . Emerg Infect Dis 2023 29 (12) 2442-2450 Both SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus can be transmitted by asymptomatic, presymptomatic, or symptomatic infected persons. We assessed effects on work attendance while ill before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States by analyzing data collected prospectively from persons with acute respiratory illnesses enrolled in a multistate study during 2018-2022. Persons with previous hybrid work experience were significantly less likely to work onsite on the day before through the first 3 days of illness than those without that experience, an effect more pronounced during the COVID-19 pandemic than during prepandemic influenza seasons. Persons with influenza or COVID-19 were significantly less likely to work onsite than persons with other acute respiratory illnesses. Among persons with positive COVID-19 test results available by the second or third day of illness, few worked onsite. Hybrid and remote work policies might reduce workplace exposures and help reduce spread of respiratory viruses. |
Vaccine effectiveness against pediatric influenza-a-associated urgent care, emergency department, and hospital encounters during the 2022-2023 Season, VISION Network
Adams K , Weber ZA , Yang DH , Klein NP , DeSilva MB , Dascomb K , Irving SA , Naleway AL , Rao S , Gaglani M , Flannery B , Garg S , Kharbanda AB , Grannis SJ , Ong TC , Embi PJ , Natarajan K , Fireman B , Zerbo O , Goddard K , Timbol J , Hansen JR , Grisel N , Arndorfer J , Ball SW , Dunne MM , Kirshner L , Chung JR , Tenforde MW . Clin Infect Dis 2023 BACKGROUND: During the 2022-2023 influenza season, the United States experienced the highest influenza-associated pediatric hospitalization rate since 2010-2011. Influenza A/H3N2 infections were predominant. METHODS: We analyzed acute respiratory illness (ARI)-associated emergency department or urgent care (ED/UC) encounters or hospitalizations at three health systems among children and adolescents aged 6 months-17 years who had influenza molecular testing during October 2022-March 2023. We estimated influenza A vaccine effectiveness (VE) using a test-negative approach. The odds of vaccination among influenza-A-positive cases and influenza-negative controls were compared after adjusting for confounders and applying inverse-propensity-to-be-vaccinated weights. We developed overall and age-stratified VE models. RESULTS: Overall, 13,547 of 44,787 (30.2%) eligible ED/UC encounters and 263 of 1,862 (14.1%) hospitalizations were influenza-A-positive cases. Among ED/UC patients, 15.2% of influenza-positive versus 27.1% of influenza-negative patients were vaccinated; VE was 48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44%-52%) overall, 53% (95% CI, 47%-58%) among children aged 6 months-4 years and 38% (95% CI, 30%-45%) among those aged 9-17 years. Among hospitalizations, 17.5% of influenza-positive versus 33.4% of influenza-negative patients were vaccinated; VE was 40% (95% CI, 6%-61%) overall, 56% (95% CI, 23%-75%) among children ages 6 months-4 years and 46% (95% CI, 2%-70%) among those 5-17 years. CONCLUSIONS: During the 2022-2023 influenza season, vaccination reduced the risk of influenza-associated ED/UC encounters and hospitalizations by almost half (overall VE 40-48%). Influenza vaccination is a critical tool to prevent moderate-to-severe influenza illness in children and adolescents. |
Severe rickettsia typhi infections, Costa Rica
Chinchilla D , Sánchez I , Chung I , Gleaton AN , Kato CY . Emerg Infect Dis 2023 29 (11) 2374-2376 Murine typhus is a febrile, fleaborne disease caused by infection with Rickettsia typhi bacteria. Cases can range from mild and nonspecific to fatal. We report 2 cases of murine typhus in Costa Rica, confirming the presence and circulation of R. typhi causing severe disease in the country. |
A conceptual framework for nomenclatural stability and validity of medically important fungi: a proposed global consensus guideline for fungal name changes supported by ABP, ASM, CLSI, ECMM, ESCMID-EFISG, EUCAST-AFST, FDLC, IDSA, ISHAM, MMSA, and MSGERC
de Hoog S , Walsh TJ , Ahmed SA , Alastruey-Izquierdo A , Alexander BD , Arendrup MC , Babady E , Bai FY , Balada-Llasat JM , Borman A , Chowdhary A , Clark A , Colgrove RC , Cornely OA , Dingle TC , Dufresne PJ , Fuller J , Gangneux JP , Gibas C , Glasgow H , Gräser Y , Guillot J , Groll AH , Haase G , Hanson K , Harrington A , Hawksworth DL , Hayden RT , Hoenigl M , Hubka V , Johnson K , Kus JV , Li R , Meis JF , Lackner M , Lanternier F , Leal SM Jr , Lee F , Lockhart SR , Luethy P , Martin I , Kwon-Chung KJ , Meyer W , Nguyen MH , Ostrosky-Zeichner L , Palavecino E , Pancholi P , Pappas PG , Procop GW , Redhead SA , Rhoads DD , Riedel S , Stevens B , Sullivan KO , Vergidis P , Roilides E , Seyedmousavi A , Tao L , Vicente VA , Vitale RG , Wang QM , Wengenack NL , Westblade L , Wiederhold N , White L , Wojewoda CM , Zhang SX . J Clin Microbiol 2023 61 (11) e0087323 The rapid pace of name changes of medically important fungi is creating challenges for clinical laboratories and clinicians involved in patient care. We describe two sources of name change which have different drivers, at the species versus the genus level. Some suggestions are made here to reduce the number of name changes. We urge taxonomists to provide diagnostic markers of taxonomic novelties. Given the instability of phylogenetic trees due to variable taxon sampling, we advocate to maintain genera at the largest possible size. Reporting of identified species in complexes or series should where possible comprise both the name of the overarching species and that of the molecular sibling, often cryptic species. Because the use of different names for the same species will be unavoidable for many years to come, an open access online database of the names of all medically important fungi, with proper nomenclatural designation and synonymy, is essential. We further recommend that while taxonomic discovery continues, the adaptation of new name changes by clinical laboratories and clinicians be reviewed routinely by a standing committee for validation and stability over time, with reference to an open access database, wherein reasons for changes are listed in a transparent way. |
P16 expression and recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after cryotherapy among women living with HIV
Maina D , Chung MH , Temmerman M , Moloo Z , Wawire J , Greene SA , Unger ER , Mugo N , Sakr S , Sayed S , McGrath CJ . Front Med (Lausanne) 2023 10 1277480 BACKGROUND: The expression of p16 protein, a surrogate marker for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV), is associated with cervical dysplasia. We evaluated correlates of p16 expression at treatment for high-grade cervical lesions and its utility in predicting the recurrence of cervical intraepithelial lesions grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) following cryotherapy among women with HIV. METHODS: This is a subgroup analysis of women with HIV in Kenya with baseline cervical biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ who were randomized to receive cryotherapy and followed every six-months for two-years for biopsy-confirmed recurrence of CIN2+. P16 immunohistochemistry was performed on the baseline cervical biopsy with a positive result defined as strong abnormal nuclear expression in a continuous block segment of cells (at least 10-20 cells). RESULTS: Among the 200 women with CIN2+ randomized to cryotherapy, 160 (80%) had a baseline cervical biopsy specimen available, of whom 94 (59%) were p16-positive. p16 expression at baseline was associated with presence of any one of 14 hrHPV genotypes [Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.2; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.03-9.78], multiple lifetime sexual partners (OR = 1.6; 95% CI, 1.03-2.54) and detectable plasma HIV viral load (>1,000 copies/mL; OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03). Longer antiretroviral therapy duration (≥2 years) at baseline had lower odds of p16 expression (OR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.87) than <2 years of antiretroviral therapy. Fifty-one women had CIN2+ recurrence over 2-years, of whom 33 (65%) were p16-positive at baseline. p16 was not associated with CIN2+ recurrence (Hazard Ratio = 1.35; 95% CI, 0.76-2.40). CONCLUSION: In this population of women with HIV and CIN2+, 41% of lesions were p16 negative and baseline p16 expression did not predict recurrence of cervical neoplasia during two-year follow up. |
Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee On Immunization Practices — United States, 2023–24 influenza season
Grohskopf LA , Blanton LH , Ferdinands JM , Chung JR , Broder KR , Talbot HK . MMWR Recommendations and Reports 2023 72 (2) This report updates the 2022–23 recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) concerning the use of seasonal influenza vaccines in the United States (MMWR Recomm Rep 2022;71[No. RR-1]:1–28). Routine annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months who do not have contraindications. All seasonal influenza vaccines expected to be available in the United States for the 2023–24 season are quadrivalent, containing hemagglutinin (HA) derived from one influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus, one influenza A(H3N2) virus, one influenza B/Victoria lineage virus, and one influenza B/Yamagata lineage virus. Inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV4s), recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4), and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) are expected to be available. For most persons who need only 1 dose of influenza vaccine for the season, vaccination should ideally be offered during September or October. However, vaccination should continue after October and throughout the season as long as influenza viruses are circulating and unexpired vaccine is available. Influenza vaccines might be available as early as July or August, but for most adults (particularly adults aged ≥65 years) and for pregnant persons in the first or second trimester, vaccination during July and August should be avoided unless there is concern that vaccination later in the season might not be possible. Certain children aged 6 months through 8 years need 2 doses; these children should receive the first dose as soon as possible after vaccine is available, including during July and August. Vaccination during July and August can be considered for children of any age who need only 1 dose for the season and for pregnant persons who are in the third trimester during these months if vaccine is available. ACIP recommends that all persons aged ≥6 months who do not have contraindications receive a licensed and age-appropriate seasonal influenza vaccine. With the exception of vaccination for adults aged ≥65 years, ACIP makes no preferential recommendation for a specific vaccine when more than one licensed, recommended, and age-appropriate vaccine is available. ACIP recommends that adults aged ≥65 years preferentially receive any one of the following higher dose or adjuvanted influenza vaccines: quadrivalent high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV4), quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4), or quadrivalent adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine (aIIV4). If none of these three vaccines is available at an opportunity for vaccine administration, then any other age-appropriate influenza vaccine should be used. Primary updates to this report include the following two topics: 1) the composition of 2023–24 U.S. seasonal influenza vaccines and 2) updated recommendations regarding influenza vaccination of persons with egg allergy. First, the composition of 2023–24 U.S. influenza vaccines includes an update to the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 component. U.S.-licensed influenza vaccines will contain HA derived from 1) an influenza A/Victoria/4897/2022 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus (for egg-based vaccines) or an influenza A/Wisconsin/67/2022 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus (for cell culture-based and recombinant vaccines); 2) an influenza A/Darwin/9/2021 (H3N2)-like virus (for egg-based vaccines) or an influenza A/Darwin/6/2021 (H3N2)-like virus (for cell culture-based and recombinant vaccines); 3) an influenza B/Austria/1359417/2021 (Victoria lineage)-like virus; and 4) an influenza B/Phuket/3073/2013 (Yamagata lineage)-like virus. Second, ACIP recommends that all persons aged ≥6 months with egg allergy should receive influenza vaccine. Any influenza vaccine (egg based or nonegg based) that is otherwise appropriate for the recipient’s age and health status can be used. It is no longer recommended that persons who have had an allergic reaction to egg involving symptoms other than urticaria should be vaccinated in an inpatient or outpatient medical setting supervised by a health care provider who is able to recognize and man ge severe allergic reactions if an egg-based vaccine is used. Egg allergy alone necessitates no additional safety measures for influenza vaccination beyond those recommended for any recipient of any vaccine, regardless of severity of previous reaction to egg. All vaccines should be administered in settings in which personnel and equipment needed for rapid recognition and treatment of acute hypersensitivity reactions are available. © (2023). All Rights Reserved. |
Coordinated approach: Comprehensive policy and action planning
Chung CS , Sliwa SA , Merlo C , Erwin H , Xu Y . J Sch Health 2023 93 (9) 853-863 BACKGROUND: Schools play a vital role in student health, and a collaborative approach may affect health factors such as physical activity (PA) and nutrition. There is a lack of recent literature synthesizing collaborative approaches in K-12 settings. We present updated evidence about interventions that used a coordinated school health approach to support K-12 student PA and nutrition in the United States. METHODS: A 2-phase literature review search included a search of systematic reviews for individual qualifying studies (2010-2018), followed by a search for individual articles (2010-2020) that evaluated a coordinated approach or use of school wellness councils, committees, or teams to address PA and/or nutrition. RESULTS: We identified 35 articles describing 30 studies and grouped them by intervention type. Interventions demonstrated promising findings for environmental changes and student dietary and PA behaviors. IMPLICATIONS: Coordinated and multicomponent interventions demonstrated significant improvements or null results, indicating that implementation of programs and/or policies to promote healthier eating and PA practices may support and do not appear to hinder environmental or behavioral outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Schools can use a coordinated approach to implement opportunities for PA and nutrition; this may influence students' PA and dietary behaviors. |
The school environment and physical and social-emotional well-being: Implications for students and school employees
Hawkins GT , Chung CS , Hertz MF , Antolin N . J Sch Health 2023 93 (9) 799-812 BACKGROUND: The school environment, consisting of the physical environment and social-emotional climate (SEC), plays a crucial role in both student and employee health; however, there is a lack of recent literature synthesizing school environment interventions in K-12 settings. We describe updated evidence about school environment interventions to support K-12 student and employee health in the United States. METHODS: A 2-phase search included a review of reviews (2010-2018), followed by a search for individual articles (2010-2020) that targeted school physical environment and/or SEC to address physical activity (PA) and/or nutrition. We also investigated how nutrition and PA interventions with an SEC component improves social-emotional and/or mental health outcomes. Because research on dietary and PA behaviors for school employees is limited; we included studies on other worksites (eg, hospitals and offices) to provide insight for school employees. FINDINGS: We identified 40 articles describing 40 unique studies and 45 interventions and grouped them by intervention type. Physical environment interventions demonstrated significant and positive nutrition and PA behavioral outcomes for students; outcomes among employees were mixed. Interventions with SEC components reported improvements in some mental health outcomes. IMPLICATIONS: The school environment can affect dietary and PA behaviors as well as mental health for students and employees. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing healthy school environments can support student and employee PA, dietary behaviors, and mental health. |
Transforming evidence into action: A commentary on school-based physical activity and nutrition intervention research
Lee SM , Harwell OR , Sliwa SA , Hawkins GT , Michael S , Merlo C , Pitt Barnes S , Chung CS , Cornett K , Hunt H . J Sch Health 2023 93 (9) 864-870 The Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) framework advances an intentional and integrated vision of policies, practices, and programs that support students' health and academic success across 10 components within school settings. WSCC promotes family and community engagement with schools and recognizes schools as key locations for equitable access to services for addressing health disparities and increasing healthy options for all students.1-3 This approach has some formal recognition in the United States; 18 states and the District of Columbia have statutes or regulations addressing WSCC or a coordinated school health approach, and another 17 include these concepts in noncodified policy language, such as nonbinding guidance, agreements, or procedures from state agencies.4 | | This special issue presents a decade of school-based physical activity (PA) and nutrition intervention research conducted across multiple WSCC components. Individually and collectively, these articles identified evidence-based strategies that can be implemented within schools and highlighted opportunities for future research focused on school-based PA and nutrition interventions. Here, we use the terms interventions and strategies interchangeably to describe changes to school policies, practices, or infrastructure. |
Microbial signatures in the lower airways of mechanically ventilated COVID19 patients associated with poor clinical outcome (preprint)
Sulaiman I , Chung M , Angel L , Koralov S , Wu B , Yeung S , Krolikowski K , Li Y , Duerr R , Schluger R , Thannickal S , Koide A , Rafeq S , Barnett C , Postelnicu R , Wang C , Banakis S , Perez-Perez L , Jour G , Shen G , Meyn P , Carpenito J , Liu X , Ji K , Collazo D , Labarbiera A , Amoroso N , Brosnahan S , Mukherjee V , Kaufman D , Bakker J , Lubinsky A , Pradhan D , Sterman D , Heguy A , Uyeki T , Clemente J , de Wit E , Schmidt AM , Shopsin B , Desvignes L , Wang C , Li H , Zhang B , Forst C , Koide S , Stapleford K , Khanna K , Ghedin E , Weiden M , Segal L . Res Sq 2021 Mortality among patients with COVID-19 and respiratory failure is high and there are no known lower airway biomarkers that predict clinical outcome. We investigated whether bacterial respiratory infections and viral load were associated with poor clinical outcome and host immune tone. We obtained bacterial and fungal culture data from 589 critically ill subjects with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. On a subset of the subjects that underwent bronchoscopy, we also quantified SARS-CoV-2 viral load, analyzed the microbiome of the lower airways by metagenome and metatranscriptome analyses and profiled the host immune response. We found that isolation of a hospital-acquired respiratory pathogen was not associated with fatal outcome. However, poor clinical outcome was associated with enrichment of the lower airway microbiota with an oral commensal ( Mycoplasma salivarium ), while high SARS-CoV-2 viral burden, poor anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response, together with a unique host transcriptome profile of the lower airways were most predictive of mortality. Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that 1) the extent of viral infectivity drives mortality in severe COVID-19, and therefore 2) clinical management strategies targeting viral replication and host responses to SARS-CoV-2 should be prioritized. |
Microbial signatures in the lower airways of mechanically ventilated COVID19 patients associated with poor clinical outcome (preprint)
Sulaiman I , Chung M , Angel L , Tsay JJ , Wu BG , Yeung ST , Krolikowski K , Li Y , Duerr R , Schluger R , Thannickal SA , Koide A , Rafeq S , Barnett C , Postelnicu R , Wang C , Banakis S , Perez-Perez L , Jour G , Shen G , Meyn P , Carpenito J , Liu X , Ji K , Collazo D , Labarbiera A , Amoroso N , Brosnahan S , Mukherjee V , Kaufman D , Bakker J , Lubinsky A , Pradhan D , Sterman DH , Weiden M , Hegu A , Evans L , Uyeki TM , Clemente JC , De Wit E , Schmidt AM , Shopsin B , Desvignes L , Wang C , Li H , Zhang B , Forst CV , Koide S , Stapleford KA , Khanna KM , Ghedin E , Segal LN . medRxiv 2021 Mortality among patients with COVID-19 and respiratory failure is high and there are no known lower airway biomarkers that predict clinical outcome. We investigated whether bacterial respiratory infections and viral load were associated with poor clinical outcome and host immune tone. We obtained bacterial and fungal culture data from 589 critically ill subjects with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. On a subset of the subjects that underwent bronchoscopy, we also quantified SARS-CoV-2 viral load, analyzed the microbiome of the lower airways by metagenome and metatranscriptome analyses and profiled the host immune response. We found that isolation of a hospital-acquired respiratory pathogen was not associated with fatal outcome. However, poor clinical outcome was associated with enrichment of the lower airway microbiota with an oral commensal ( Mycoplasma salivarium ), while high SARS-CoV-2 viral burden, poor anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response, together with a unique host transcriptome profile of the lower airways were most predictive of mortality. Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that 1) the extent of viral infectivity drives mortality in severe COVID-19, and therefore 2) clinical management strategies targeting viral replication and host responses to SARS-CoV-2 should be prioritized. |
mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness against COVID-19 among Symptomatic Outpatients Aged ≥16 Years in the United States, February – May 2021 (preprint)
Kim SS , Chung JR , Belongia EA , McLean HQ , King JP , Nowalk MP , Zimmerman RK , Balasubramani GK , Martin ET , Monto AS , Lamerato LE , Gaglani M , Smith ME , Dunnigan KM , Jackson ML , Jackson LA , Tenforde MW , Verani JR , Kobayashi M , Schrag S , Patel MM , Flannery B . medRxiv 2021 2021.07.20.21260647 Evaluations of vaccine effectiveness (VE) are important to monitor as COVID-19 vaccines are introduced in the general population. Research staff enrolled symptomatic participants seeking outpatient medical care for COVID-19-like illness or SARS-CoV-2 testing from a multisite network. VE was evaluated using the test-negative design. Among 236 SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test-positive and 576 test-negative participants aged ≥16 years, VE of mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 was 91% (95% CI: 83-95) for full vaccination and 75% (95% CI: 55-87) for partial vaccination. Vaccination was associated with prevention of most COVID-19 cases among people seeking outpatient medical care.Competing Interest StatementMPN reports grants from Merck & Co. outside the submitted work. RKZ reports grants from Sanofi Pasteur outside the submitted work. GKB reports grants from Merck & Co outside the submitted work and consulting fees from New World Medical, LLC. ETM reports grants from Merck & Co. outside the submitted work and consulting fees from Pfizer. ASM reports consulting fees from Sanofi Pasteur and Seqirus. LEL reports grants from Xcenda, Inc., eMAXHealth, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Evidera outside the submitted work. MLJ reports grants from Sanofi Pasteur. All other authors report nothing to disclose.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through cooperative agreements U01IP001034-U01IP001039. At Pittsburgh, the project was also supported by the National Institutes of Health through grant ULTR001857.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention IRB project determination numbers for included projects: 0900f3eb81c2e791, 0900f3eb81c52dc5; 0900f3eb81c52420, 0900f3eb81bc746b, 6238All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDe-identified dataset can be made available upon request |
Impact of Diabetes Status on Immunogenicity of Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults (preprint)
Spencer S , Chung JR , Belongia EA , Sundaram M , Meece J , Coleman LA , Zimmerman RK , Nowalk MP , Moehling Geffel K , Ross T , Carter CE , Shay D , Levine M , Liepkalns J , Kim JH , Sambhara S , Thompson MG , Flannery B . medRxiv 2021 2021.10.04.21264429 Individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus experience high rates of influenza virus infection and complications. We compared the magnitude and duration of serologic response to trivalent influenza vaccine in adults aged 50-80 with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Serologic response to influenza vaccination was similar in both groups: greater fold-increases in antibody titer occurred among individuals with lower pre-vaccination antibody titers. Waning of antibody titers was not influenced by diabetes status.Competing Interest StatementKKM, MPN and RZ have received research funds from Merck & Co., Inc and Pfizer, Inc. KKM and RZ have received research funds from Sanofi Pasteur, Inc. LC is currently employed by Novartis. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by cooperative agreements U01 IP000471 and U01 IP000467 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of those authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional Review Boards at the University of Pittsburgh and Marshfield Clinic approved this study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are not publicly available at this time. |
Estimating incidence of infection from diverse data sources: Zika virus in Puerto Rico, 2016 (preprint)
Quandelacy TM , Healy JM , Greening B , Rodriguez DM , Chung KW , Kuehnert MJ , Biggerstaff BJ , Dirlikov E , Mier YTeran-Romero L , Sharp TM , Waterman S , Johansson MA . medRxiv 2020 2020.10.14.20212134 Emerging epidemics are challenging to track. Only a subset of cases is recognized and reported, as seen with the Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemic where large proportions of infection were asymptomatic. However, multiple imperfect indicators of infection provide an opportunity to estimate the underlying incidence of infection. We developed a modeling approach that integrates a generic Time-series Susceptible-Infected-Recovered epidemic model with assumptions about reporting biases in a Bayesian framework and applied it to the 2016 Zika epidemic in Puerto Rico using three indicators: suspected arboviral cases, suspected Zika-associated Guillain-Barré Syndrome cases, and blood bank data. Using this combination of surveillance data, we estimated the peak of the epidemic occurred during the week of August 15, 2016 (the 33rd week of year), and 120 to 140 (50% credible interval [CrI], 95% CrI: 97 to 170) weekly infections per 10,000 population occurred at the peak. By the end of 2016, we estimated that approximately 890,000 (95% CrI: 660,000 to 1,100,000) individuals were infected in 2016 (26%, 95% CrI: 19% to 33%, of the population infected). Utilizing multiple indicators offers the opportunity for real-time and retrospective situational awareness to support epidemic preparedness and response.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe author(s) received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Exemption was obtained from the CDC Human Subjects Research Office as the data were collected as part of regular surveillance activities.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. |
Clinical symptoms among ambulatory patients tested for SARS-CoV-2 (preprint)
Chung JR , Kim SS , Jackson ML , Jackson LA , Belongia EA , King JP , Zimmerman RK , Nowalk MP , Martin ET , Monto AS , Gaglani M , Smith ME , Patel M , Flannery B . medRxiv 2020 2020.10.20.20213272 We compared symptoms and characteristics of 4961 ambulatory patients with and without laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Findings indicate that clinical symptoms alone would be insufficient to distinguish between COVID-19 and other respiratory infections (e.g., influenza) and/or to evaluate the effects of preventive interventions (e.g., vaccinations).Competing Interest StatementAll authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: AM reports personal fees from Sanofi Pasteur and from Seqirus outside the submitted work; EB reports grants from CDC during the conduct of the study. EM reports grants from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Pfizer outside the submitted work; LJ reports grants from CDC during the conduct of the study and grants from Novavax outside the submitted work; MG reports grants from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during the conduct of the study and grants from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - Abt Associates outside the submitted work; MJ reports grants from Centers for Disease Control during the conduct of the study and grants from Sanofi Pasteur outside the submitted work; MN reports grants from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study and grants from Merck & Co outside the submitted work; RZ reports grants from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study and grants from Sanofi Pasteur outside the submitted work. All other authors have nothing to disclose.Funding StatementThis work was supported through cooperative agreements funded by US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and, at the University of Pittsburgh, by infrastructure funding by UL1 TR001857 from National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Approved or waived by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) IRB with reliance on: 1.University of Michigan IRB (Approved) a. CDC protocol 6238 b. University of Michigan protocol HUM00119183 2. University of Pittsburgh IRB (Approved) a. CDC protocol 6219 b. University of Pittsburgh protocol STUDY19070407 3. Baylor Scott and White Health IRB (Approved) a. CDC protocols 7125 and 7277 b. Baylor Scott and White protocols 160145 and 20-153 4. Kaiser Permanente Washington Research Institute (Waived) 5. Marshfield Clinic Research Institute (Approved) a. CDC protocol 6197 b. Marshfield Clinic Research Institute protocol BEL10511 All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData may be made available in accordance with CDC data availability policy. |
Evaluating reduced effectiveness after repeat influenza vaccination while accounting for confounding by recent infection and within-season waning (preprint)
Bi Q , Dickerman BA , McLean HQ , Martin ET , Gaglani M , Wernli KJ , Goundappa B , Flannery B , Lipsitch M , Cobey S , Murthy K , Raiyani C , Dunnigan K , Mamawala M , Chung JR , Patel M , Lamerato L , Jackson ML , Phillips CH , Kiniry E , Belongia EA , King JP , Monto AS , Zimmerman RK , Nowalk MP , Geffel KM . medRxiv 2023 17 Background. Studies have reported that prior-season influenza vaccination is associated with higher risk of clinical influenza infection among vaccinees in a given season. Understanding the underlying causes requires consideration of within-season waning and recent infection. Methods. Using the US Flu Vaccine Effectiveness (VE) Network data over 8 influenza seasons (2011-2012 to 2018-2019), we estimated the effect of prior-season vaccination on the odds of clinical infection in a given season, after accounting for waning vaccine protection using regression methods. We adjusted for potential confounding by recent clinical infection using inverse-probability weighting. We investigated theoretically whether unmeasured subclinical infection in the prior season, which is more likely in the non-repeat vaccinees, could explain the repeat vaccination effect. Results. Repeat vaccinees vaccinated earlier in a season by one week. After accounting for waning VE, repeat vaccinees were still more likely to test positive for influenza A(H3N2) (OR=1.11, 95% CI:1.02-1.21) but not for influenza B (OR=1.03, 95% CI:0.89-1.18) or A(H1N1) (OR=1.03, 95% CI:0.90-1.19) compared to those vaccinated in the given season only. Recent clinical infection with the homologous (sub)type protected against clinical infection with A(H3N2) or B. Individuals with clinical infection in one season had 1.11 (95% CI:1.03-1.19) times the odds of switching vaccination status in the following season. Adjusting for recent clinical infections did not strongly influence the estimated effect of prior-season vaccination. Adjusting for subclinical infection could theoretically attenuate this effect. Conclusion. Waning protection and recent clinical infection were insufficient to explain observed reduced VE in repeat vaccinees with a test-negative design. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. |
School-located influenza vaccination and community-wide indirect effects: Reconciling mathematical models to epidemiologic models (preprint)
Arinaminpathy N , Reed C , Biggerstaff M , Nguyen A , Athni TS , Arnold BF , Hubbard A , Colford JM , Reingold A , Benjamin-Chung J . medRxiv 2022 13 Background: Mathematical models and empirical epidemiologic studies (e.g., randomized and observational studies) are complementary tools but may produce conflicting results for a given research question. We used sensitivity analyses and bias analyses to explore such discrepancies in a study of the indirect effects of influenza vaccination. Method(s): We fit an age-structured, deterministic, compartmental model to estimate indirect effects of a school-based influenza vaccination program in California that was evaluated in a previous matched cohort study. To understand discrepancies in their results, we used 1) a model with constrained parameters such that projections matched the cohort study; and 2) probabilistic bias analyses to identify potential biases (e.g., outcome misclassification due to incomplete influenza testing) that, if corrected, would align the empirical results with the mathematical model. Result(s): The indirect effect estimate (% reduction in influenza hospitalization among older adults in intervention vs. control) was 22.3% (95% CI 7.6% - 37.1%) in the cohort study but only 1.6% (95% Bayesian credible intervals 0.4 - 4.4%) in the mathematical model. When constrained, mathematical models aligned with the cohort study when there was substantially lower pre-existing immunity among school-age children and older adults. Conversely, empirical estimates corrected for potential bias aligned with mathematical model estimates only if influenza testing rates were 15-23% lower in the intervention vs. comparison site. Conclusion(s): Sensitivity and bias analysis can shed light on why results of mathematical models and empirical epidemiologic studies differ for the same research question, and in turn, can improve study and model design. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license. |
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in standardised first few X cases and household transmission investigations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Lewis HC , Marcato AJ , Meagher N , Valenciano M , Villanueva-Cabezas JP , Spirkoska V , Fielding JE , Karahalios A , Subissi L , Nardone A , Cheng B , Rajatonirina S , Okeibunor J , Aly EA , Barakat A , Jorgensen P , Azim T , Wijesinghe PR , Le LV , Rodriguez A , Vicari A , Van Kerkhove M , McVernon J , Pebody R , Price DJ , Bergeri I , Alemu MA , Alvi Y , Bukusi EA , Chung PS , Dambadarjaa D , Das AK , Dub T , Dulacha D , Ebrahim F , Gonzalez-Duarte MA , Guruge D , Heredia-Melo DC , Herman-Roloff A , Herring BL , Islam F , Jeewandara KC , Kant S , Lako R , Leite J , Malavige GN , Mandakh U , Mariam W , Mend T , Mize VA , Musa S , Nohynek H , Olu OO , Osorio-Merchan MB , Pereyaslov D , Ransom J , Ariqi LA , Khan W , Saxena S , Sharma P , Sreedevi A , Satheesh M , Subhashini KJ , Tippet-Barr BA , Usha A , Wamala JF , Watare SH , Yadav K , Inbanathan FY . Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2022 16 (5) 803-819 Abstract We aimed to estimate the household secondary infection attack rate (hSAR) of SARS-CoV-2 in investigations aligned with the WHO Unity Studies Household Transmission Investigations (HHTI) protocol. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and medRxiv/bioRxiv for “Unity-aligned” First Few X cases (FFX) and HHTIs published 1 December 2019 to 26 July 2021. Standardised early results were shared by WHO Unity Studies collaborators (to 1 October 2021). We used a bespoke tool to assess investigation methodological quality. Values for hSAR and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted or calculated from crude data. Heterogeneity was assessed by visually inspecting overlap of CIs on forest plots and quantified in meta-analyses. Of 9988 records retrieved, 80 articles (64 from databases; 16 provided by Unity Studies collaborators) were retained in the systematic review; 62 were included in the primary meta-analysis. hSAR point estimates ranged from 2% to 90% (95% prediction interval: 3%–71%; I2 = 99.7%); I2 values remained >99% in subgroup analyses, indicating high, unexplained heterogeneity and leading to a decision not to report pooled hSAR estimates. FFX and HHTI remain critical epidemiological tools for early and ongoing characterisation of novel infectious pathogens. The large, unexplained variance in hSAR estimates emphasises the need to further support standardisation in planning, conduct and analysis, and for clear and comprehensive reporting of FFX and HHTIs in time and place, to guide evidence-based pandemic preparedness and response efforts for SARS-CoV-2, influenza and future novel respiratory viruses. |
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in standardised First Few X cases and household transmission investigations: a systematic review and meta-analysis (preprint)
Lewis HC , Marcato AJ , Meagher N , Valenciano M , Villanueva-Cabezas JP , Spirkoska V , Fielding JE , Karahalios A , Subissi L , Nardone A , Cheng B , Rajatonirina S , Okeibunor J , Aly EA , Barakat A , Jorgensen P , Azim T , Wijesinghe PR , Le LV , Rodriguez A , Vicari A , Van Kerkhove M , McVernon J , Pebody R , Price DJ , Bergeri I , Alemu MA , Alvi Y , Bukusi EA , Chung PS , Dambadarjaa D , Das AK , Dub T , Dulacha D , Ebrahim F , Gonzalez-Duarte MA , Guruge D , Heredia-Melo DC , Herman-Roloff A , Herring BL , Islam F , Jeewandara KC , Kant S , Lako R , Leite J , Malavige GN , Mandakh U , Mariam W , Mend T , Mize VA , Musa S , Nohynek H , Olu OO , Osorio-Merchan MB , Pereyaslov D , Ransom J , Ariqi LA , Khan W , Saxena S , Sharma P , Sreedevi A , Satheesh M , Subhashini KJ , Tippet-Barr BA , Usha A , Wamala JF , Watare SH , Yadav K , Inbanathan FY . medRxiv 2022 03 (5) 803-819 We aimed to estimate the household secondary infection attack rate (hSAR) of SARS-CoV-2 in investigations aligned with the WHO Unity Studies Household Transmission Investigations (HHTI) protocol. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and medRxiv/bioRxiv for 'Unity-aligned' First Few X cases (FFX) and HHTIs published between 1 December 2019 and 26 July 2021. Standardised early results were shared by WHO Unity Studies collaborators (to 1 October 2021). We used a bespoke tool to assess investigation methodological quality. Values for hSAR and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted or calculated from crude data. Heterogeneity was assessed by visually inspecting overlap of CIs on forest plots and quantified in meta-analyses. Of 9988 records retrieved, 80 articles (64 from databases; 16 provided by Unity Studies collaborators) were retained in the systematic review and 62 were included in the primary meta-analysis. hSAR point estimates ranged from 2%-90% (95% prediction interval: 3%-71%; I2=99.7%); I2 values remained >99% in subgroup analyses, indicating high, unexplained heterogeneity and leading to a decision not to report pooled hSAR estimates. FFX and HHTI remain critical epidemiological tools for early and ongoing characterisation of novel infectious pathogens. The large, unexplained variance in hSAR estimates emphasises the need to further support standardisation in planning, conduct and analysis, and for clear and comprehensive reporting of FFX and HHTIs in time and place, to guide evidence-based pandemic preparedness and response efforts for SARS-CoV-2, influenza and future novel respiratory viruses. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license. |
Vaccine Effectiveness against COVID-19 among Symptomatic Persons Aged >=12 Years with Reported Contact with COVID-19 Cases, February - September 2021 (preprint)
Chung JR , Kim SS , Belongia EA , McLean HQ , King JP , Nowalk MP , Zimmerman RK , Geffel KM , Martin ET , Monto AS , Lamerato LE , Gaglani M , Hoffman E , Volz M , Jackson ML , Jackson LA , Patel MM , Flannery B . medRxiv 2022 01 Individuals in contact with persons with COVID-19 are at high risk of developing COVID-19, but protection offered by COVID-19 vaccines in the context of known exposure is unknown. Symptomatic outpatients reporting acute onset of COVID-19-like illness and tested for SARSCoV-2 infection were enrolled. Among 2,229 participants, 283/451 (63%) of those reporting contact and 331/1778 (19%) without known contact tested SARS-CoV-2 positive. Using the test-negative design, adjusted vaccine effectiveness was 71% (95% confidence interval, 49%-83%) among fully vaccinated participants reporting contact versus 80% (95% CI, 72%-86%) among those without. This study supports COVID-19 vaccination and highlights the importance of efforts to increase vaccination coverage. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. |
Presence of Symptoms 6 Weeks After COVID-19 Among Vaccinated and Unvaccinated U.S. Healthcare Personnel (preprint)
Mohr NM , Plumb ID , Harland KK , Pilishvili T , Fleming-Dutra KE , Krishnadasan A , Hoth KF , Saydah SH , Mankoff Z , Haran JP , Leon ES , Talan DA , Smithline HA , Hou PC , Lee LC , Lim SC , Moran GJ , Steele MT , Beiser DG , Faine B , Nandi U , Schrading WA , Chinnock B , Chipman A , Fuentes M , LoVecchio F , Clinansmith B , Landers S , Horcher A , Wallace K , Uribe L , Pathmarajah K , Poronsky KE , Hashimoto DM , Bahamon M , Romain MSt , Kean E , Krebs E , Stubbs A , Roy S , Volturo G , Higgins A , Galbraith J , Crosby JC , Mulrow M , Gonzalez E , Gierke R , Farrar JL , Xing W , Chung Y , Yousaf A , Okaro JO , Briggs-Hagen M , Abedi GR , Nyanseor S , Watts CK . medRxiv 2022 25 Importance: Although COVID-19 vaccines protect against infection and severe disease, the role of vaccination in preventing prolonged symptoms in those with subsequent infection is unclear. Objective(s): To determine differences in symptoms stratified by prior vaccination reported by healthcare personnel (HCP) 6 weeks after onset of COVID-19, and whether there were differences in timing of return to work. Design(s): Nested cohort study within a multicenter vaccine effectiveness study. HCP with COVID-19 between December 2020 and August 2021 were followed up 6 weeks after illness onset. Setting(s): Health systems in 12 U.S. states. Participant(s): HCP participating in a vaccine effectiveness study were eligible for inclusion if they had confirmed COVID-19 with either verified mRNA vaccination (symptom onset =14 days after two doses) or no prior COVID-19 vaccination. Among 681 eligible participants, 419 (61%) completed a follow-up survey approximately 6 weeks after illness onset. Exposures: Two doses of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine compared with no COVID-19 vaccine. Main Outcomes and Measures: Presence of symptoms 6 weeks after onset of COVID-19 illness and days to return to work after COVID-19 illness. Result(s): Among 419 HCP with confirmed COVID-19, 298 (71%) reported one or more COVID-like symptoms 6 weeks after illness onset, with a lower prevalence among vaccinated participants (60.6%) compared with unvaccinated participants (60.6% vs. 79.1%; aRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.84). Vaccinated HCP returned to work a median 2.0 days (95% CI 1.0-3.0) sooner than unvaccinated HCP (aHR 1.37; 95% CI, 1.04-1.79). Conclusion(s): A history of two doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine among HCP with COVID-19 illness was associated with decreased risk of COVID-like symptoms at 6 weeks and earlier to return to work. Vaccination is associated with improved recovery from COVID-19, in addition to preventing symptomatic infection. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. |
Effectiveness of 2 and 3 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Doses against Omicron and Delta-Related Outpatient Illness among Adults, October 2021 - February 2022 (preprint)
Kim SS , Chung JR , Talbot HK , Grijalva CG , Wernli KJ , Martin ET , Monto AS , Belongia EA , McLean HQ , Gaglani M , Mamawala M , Nowalk MP , Geffel KM , Tartof SY , Florea A , Lee JS , Tenforde MW , Patel MM , Flannery B , Bentz ML , Burgin A , Burroughs M , Davis ML , Howard D , Lacek K , Madden JC , Nobles S , Padilla J , Sheth M , Arroliga A , Beeram M , Dunnigan K , Ettlinger J , Graves A , Hoffman E , Jatla M , McKillop A , Murthy K , Mutnal M , Priest E , Raiyani C , Rao A , Requenez L , Settele N , Smith M , Stone K , Thomas J , Volz M , Walker K , Zayed M , Annan E , Daley P , Kniss K , Merced-Morales A , Ayala E , Amundsen B , Aragones M , Calderon R , Hong V , Jimenez G , Kim J , Ku J , Lewin B , McDaniel A , Reyes A , Shaw S , Takhar H , Torres A , Burganowski R , Kiniry E , Moser KA , Nguyen M , Park S , Wellwood S , Wickersham B , Alvarado-Batres J , Benz S , Berger H , Bissonnette A , Blake J , Boese K , Botten E , Boyer J , Braun M , Breu B , Burbey G , Cravillion C , Delgadillo C , Donnerbauer A , Dziedzic T , Eddy J , Edgren H , Ermeling A , Ewert K , Fehrenbach C , Fernandez R , Frome W , Guzinski S , Heeren L , Herda D , Hertel M , Heuer G , Higdon E , Ivacic L , Jepsen L , Kaiser S , Karl J , Keffer B , King J , Koepel TK , Kohl S , Kohn S , Kohnhorst D , Kronholm E , Le T , Lemieux A , Marcis C , Maronde M , McCready I , McGreevey K , Meece J , Mehta N , Miesbauer D , Moon V , Moran J , Nikolai C , Olson B , Olstadt J , Ott L , Pan N , Pike C , Polacek D , Presson M , Price N , Rayburn C , Reardon C , Rotar M , Rottscheit C , Salzwedel J , Saucedo J , Scheffen K , Schug C , Seyfert K , Shrestha R , Slenczka A , Stefanski E , Strupp M , Tichenor M , Watkins L , Zachow A , Zimmerman B , Bauer S , Beney K , Cheng CK , Faraj N , Getz A , Grissom M , Groesbeck M , Harrison S , Henson K , Jermanus K , Johnson E , Kaniclides A , Kimberly A , Lamerato LE , Lauring A , Lehmann-Wandell R , McSpadden EJ , Nabors L , Truscon R , Balasubramani GK , Bear T , Bobeck J , Bowser E , Clarke K , Clarke LG , Dauer K , Deluca C , Dierks B , Haynes L , Hickey R , Johnson M , Jonsson A , Luosang N , McKown L , Peterson A , Phaturos D , Rectenwald A , Sax TM , Stiegler M , Susick M , Suyama J , Taylor L , Walters S , Weissman A , Williams JV , Blair M , Carter J , Chappell J , Copen E , Denney M , Graes K , Halasa N , Lindsell C , Liu Z , Longmire S , McHenry R , Short L , Tan HN , Vargas D , Wrenn J , Wyatt D , Zhu Y . medRxiv 2022 10 Background: We estimated SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron-specific effectiveness of 2 and 3 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses in adults against symptomatic illness in US outpatient settings. Method(s): Between October 1, 2021, and February 12, 2022, research staff consented and enrolled eligible participants who had fever, cough, or loss of taste or smell and sought outpatient medical care or clinical SARS-CoV-2 testing within 10 days of illness onset. Using the test-negative design, we compared the odds of receiving 2 or 3 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses among SARS-CoV-2 cases versus controls using logistic regression. Regression models were adjusted for study site, age, onset week, and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was calculated as (1 - adjusted odds ratio) x 100%. Result(s): Among 3847 participants included for analysis, 574 (32%) of 1775 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the Delta predominant period and 1006 (56%) of 1794 participants tested positive during the Omicron predominant period. When Delta predominated, VE against symptomatic illness in outpatient settings was 63% (95% CI: 51% to 72%) among mRNA 2-dose recipients and 96% (95% CI: 93% to 98%) for 3-dose recipients. When Omicron predominated, VE was 21% (95% CI: -6% to 41%) among 2-dose recipients and 62% (95% CI: 48% to 72%) among 3-dose recipients. Conclusion(s): In this adult population, 3 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses provided substantial protection against symptomatic illness in outpatient settings when the Omicron variant became the predominant cause of COVID-19 in the U.S. These findings support the recommendation for a 3rd mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. |
Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Against Influenza A(H3N2)-Related Illness in the United States During the 2021-2022 Influenza Season (preprint)
Price AM , Flannery B , Talbot HK , Grijalva CG , Wernli KJ , Phillips CH , Monto AS , Martin ET , Belongia EA , McLean HQ , Gaglani M , Mutnal M , Geffel KM , Nowalk MP , Tartof SY , Florea A , McLean C , Kim SS , Patel MM , Chung JR . medRxiv 2022 05 Background. In the United States, influenza activity during the 2021-2022 season was modest and sufficient enough to estimate influenza vaccine effectiveness for the first time since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. We estimated influenza vaccine effectiveness against lab-confirmed outpatient acute illness caused by predominant A(H3N2) viruses. Methods. Between October 2021 and April 2022, research staff across 7 sites enrolled patients aged >=6 months seeking outpatient care for acute respiratory illness with cough. Using a test-negative design, we assessed VE against influenza A(H3N2). Due to strong correlation between influenza and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, participants who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were excluded from vaccine effectiveness estimations. Estimates were adjusted for site, age, month of illness, race/ethnicity and general health status. Results. Among 6,260 participants, 468 (7%) tested positive for influenza only, including 440 (94%) for A(H3N2). All 206 sequenced A(H3N2) viruses were characterized as belonging to genetic group 3C.2a1b subclade 2a.2, which has antigenic differences from the 2021-2022 season A(H3N2) vaccine component that belongs to clade 3C.2a1b subclade 2a.1. After excluding 1,948 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients, 4,312 patients were included in analyses of influenza VE; 2,463 (57%) were vaccinated against influenza. Effectiveness against A(H3N2) for all ages was 36% (95%CI, 20-49%) overall; 40% (95%CI, 24-53%) for those aged 6 months-49 years; and 10% (95%CI, -60-49%) for those aged >=50 years. Conclusion. Influenza vaccination in 2021-2022 provided protection against influenza A(H3N2)-related outpatient visits among young persons, with no measurable protection among older adults. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. |
The state of the pediatric HIV epidemic in Lesotho: results from a population-based survey
Frederix K , Schwitters A , Chung G , McCracken S , Kupamundi T , Patel HK , Arpadi S , Domaoal RA , Ntene-Sealiete K , Thin K , Wiesner L , Low A . AIDS 2023 37 (9) 1377-1386 OBJECTIVE: Lesotho does not have reliable data on HIV prevalence in children, relying on estimates generated from program data. The 2016 Lesotho Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (LePHIA) aimed to determine HIV prevalence among children 0-14 years to assess the effectiveness of the prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT) program and guide future policy. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of children under 15 years underwent household-based, two-stage HIV testing from November 2016-May 2017. Children <18 months with a reactive screening test were tested for HIV infection using total nucleic acid (TNA) PCR. Parents (61.1%) or legal guardians (38.9%) provided information on children's clinical history. Children aged 10-14 years also answered a questionnaire on knowledge and behaviors. RESULTS: HIV prevalence was 2.1% (95% CI: 1.5-2.6%). Prevalence in 10-14 year olds (3.2%; 95% CI: 2.1%, 4.2%) was significantly greater compared to 0-4 year olds (1.0%; 95% CI: 0.5%, 1.6%). HIV prevalence in girls and boys was 2.6% (95% CI: 1.8% - 3.3%) and 1.5% (95% CI: 1.0% - 2.1%), respectively. Based on reported status and/or the presence of detectable antiretrovirals, 81.1% (95% CI: 71.7-90.4%) of HIV-positive children were aware of their status, 98.2% (95% CI: 90.7 - 100.0%) of those aware were on ART and 73.9% (95% CI: 62.1-85.8%) of those on ART were virally suppressed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the roll-out of Option B+ in Lesotho in 2013, pediatric HIV prevalence remains high. Further research is required to understand the greater prevalence among girls, barriers to PMTCT, and how to better achieve viral suppression in children living with HIV. |
Influenza vaccine effectiveness among children: 2011-2020
Hood N , Flannery B , Gaglani M , Beeram M , Wernli K , Jackson ML , Martin ET , Monto AS , Zimmerman R , Raviotta J , Belongia EA , McLean HQ , Kim S , Patel MM , Chung JR . Pediatrics 2023 151 (4) BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Infants and children are at increased risk of severe influenza virus infection and its complications. Influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) varies by age, influenza season, and influenza virus type/subtype. This study's objective was to examine the effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccine against outpatient influenza illness in the pediatric population over 9 influenza seasons after the 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic. METHODS: During the 2011-2012 through the 2019-2020 influenza seasons at outpatient clinics at 5 sites of the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network, children aged 6 months to 17 years with an acute respiratory illness were tested for influenza using real-time, reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated using a test-negative design. RESULTS: Among 24 148 enrolled children, 28% overall tested positive for influenza, 3017 tested positive for influenza A(H3N2), 1459 for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, and 2178 for influenza B. Among all enrollees, 39% overall were vaccinated, with 29% of influenza cases and 43% of influenza-negative controls vaccinated. Across all influenza seasons, the pooled VE for any influenza was 46% (95% confidence interval, 43-50). Overall and by type/subtype, VE against influenza illness was highest among children in the 6- to 59-month age group compared with older pediatric age groups. VE was lowest for influenza A(H3N2) virus infection. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of multiple seasons suggested substantial benefit against outpatient illness. Investigation of host-specific or virus-related mechanisms that may result in differences by age and virus type/subtype may help further efforts to promote increased vaccination coverage and other influenza-related preventative measures. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Apr 22, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure